Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”

Amoraim couldn’t disagreement tannaitic rulings as opposed to tannaitic assistance nonetheless they composed walls around the Torah to stop inadvertent sins

It declaration of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi fundamentally removed all the menstruating female on the typical menstrual classification and you may placed him or her regarding the abnormal standing out-of zava since most typical episodes last about 3 days. Seem to his matter is actually you to definitely considering the state-of-the-art clarifications must determine when a person is niddah if in case you can getting a good zava, you to definitely you’ll visited get wrong that have grievous consequences. First the fresh new decree got minimal perception; it seems having been local, that can was indeed limited by times when doubt was inside it and local society wasn’t well enough read to determine during the such as for example issues ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Yes it was not an over-all decree for all away from Israel, nonetheless it are step one in that recommendations. In the first a few examples, Rabbi’s report works together a female exactly who may be a zava or possibly good niddah. She actually is treated in the 1st situation just like the a beneficial niddah, having a good 7-big date age of impurity, as opposed to eventually regarding impurity throughout the day regarding bleeding, the signal getting a minor zava. On the second analogy she is addressed as the good niddah and you may a zava in case your first-day is for the the woman ziva several months (the fresh new eleven months between monthly period periods). On third condition, she’s handled because the an entire zava. All around three rulings do the a great deal more stringent condition.

Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )

Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) «spokesman.» Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.