Natural and you can relative wavelengths (N and you can %) was basically gotten on distributions of one’s selected variables towards a couple of teams: Individuals who reported previously which have an excellent Pap smudge test and those whom did not. The general organization fact was used to choose differences in the withdrawals away from picked variables by the two teams. Pattern are assessed to your Mantel-Haenszel chi-square attempt. Possibility rates (ORs) and you will 95% depend on menstruation (CIs) had been produced once the measures out-of association for all variables of the a couple of organizations. One another harsh and adjusted tips of association was made for everybody variables. All the ORs and you can CIs was basically determined regarding logistic regression equations. Missing beliefs was in fact omitted about data. The research are conducted having Statistical Study App (SAS), variation nine.step 3 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). All the claimed P-values are a couple of-tailed.
Ever endured good pap smear
Towards the latest adjusted design having Pap smear condition [ Dining table step one ], the statistically high variables in the no. 1 analyses have been inserted to your a great logistic regression model. Backwards stepwise logistic regression is actually performed. Parameters which have a statistical requirement for P Dining table 2 . Around 66% (265 off 403) of one’s data populace got a good Pap smear and only sixteen% had an excellent Pap try within the past seasons. There had been tall differences (P Table step 3 shows degree, thinking, and you will techniques in the cervical disease and you can Pap smear screening. On 66% of one’s ladies who got ever received a beneficial Pap smudge got went to a doctor more often than once annually in contrast to 54% of women who’d never really had an excellent Pap smear (P = 0.05). A little one or more-last (28%) of women who’d ever endured good Pap smear got discussed cancers making use of their doctor compared with sixteen% who had never ever had a beneficial Pap smudge (P Dining table cuatro ]. Almost you to-3rd (30%) of ladies who got never really had a great Pap (30%) reported that they’d gender before many years sixteen compared to the 19% of females who had had a Pap smudge (P Dining table 5 suggests extreme variations in brand new distributions of females whom indicated that it feared the fresh new Pap make sure called for a lot more sufficient information (P Table step 1 ], ladies in the brand new 31-39 decades age bracket was basically nearly 3 x more likely to have ever had an effective Pap smudge compared to the ladies in the brand new youngest generation (19-29 ages;95% CI: 1.41, 5.65). Women that was 40-44 years old have been 6.twice very likely to provides had an excellent Pap smear compared to the women in the fresh 19-30 decades age group (95% CI: 2.65, )pared towards the youngest age bracket (19-30 age), females 50 years and earlier were 4.five times prone to have acquired an excellent Pap smear (95% CI: step 1.89, ).
Multivariate logistic regression
Than the single females, hitched girls was 2 times prone to have obtained an effective Pap smudge (95% CI: step one.thirteen, step 3.73). Parity has also been discovered to be on the use out-of Pap smear, while the ladies which have one youngster (OR: 4.57, 95% CI: step one.90, , P 0.5) and those with a couple of people (OR: dos.39, 95% CI: step 1.09, 5.20, P 0.5) was indeed prone to provides ever had a good Pap smudge compared so you’re able to women that did not have any college students. four times prone to has ever endured a great Pap smudge than the ladies who got intercourse shortly after decades 16 (95% CI: 1.37, cuatro.98).
Women that chatted about malignant tumors using their health organization was basically twice very likely to keeps ever had an effective Pap smudge (95% CI: step 1.09, step three.94)pared which have women who stated that “taking malignant tumors or being sick” try results of not having an excellent Pap smudge, people who reported that there are “zero outcomes” of not having an excellent Pap smear was indeed 60% less likely to want to features had a Pap smear (95% CI: 0.17, 0.93).
